<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Comments, notes and a&#8230; ah&#8230; correction	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://davecormier.com/edblog/2006/08/15/comments-notes-and-a-ah-correction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://davecormier.com/edblog/2006/08/15/comments-notes-and-a-ah-correction/</link>
	<description>Dave Cormier’s occasional thoughts about education and learning</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 10:44:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: admin		</title>
		<link>https://davecormier.com/edblog/2006/08/15/comments-notes-and-a-ah-correction/comment-page-1/#comment-3455</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 10:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://davecormier.com/edblog/?p=72#comment-3455</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Koschei,
I&#039;m not sure that there is any proof that blackboard has &#039;pissed off its core customers&#039;. To my knowledge, few people in the edublog community are actually paying blackboard anything. Many administrators are probably blissfully unaware of this situation or, if they&#039;ve recently chosen blackboard, are probably feeling like they made the safe choice. Until i see a few &#039;this university left blackboard &#039;cause they&#039;re pissed off&#039; i will remain unconvinced. And most people don&#039;t do business that way.

Hey Tom,
Now... I removed your name from that post because i didn&#039;t want to single you out! :) You have to admit Tom, your post was a little argumentative. As the comments on your blog attest, an inference was read into your post that you were jaded BECAUSE you have been aware of it longer. It&#039;s a weakness of text, it&#039;s essentially transmission based, no matter how much we interact after the fact.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Koschei,<br />
I&#8217;m not sure that there is any proof that blackboard has &#8216;pissed off its core customers&#8217;. To my knowledge, few people in the edublog community are actually paying blackboard anything. Many administrators are probably blissfully unaware of this situation or, if they&#8217;ve recently chosen blackboard, are probably feeling like they made the safe choice. Until i see a few &#8216;this university left blackboard &#8217;cause they&#8217;re pissed off&#8217; i will remain unconvinced. And most people don&#8217;t do business that way.</p>
<p>Hey Tom,<br />
Now&#8230; I removed your name from that post because i didn&#8217;t want to single you out! 🙂 You have to admit Tom, your post was a little argumentative. As the comments on your blog attest, an inference was read into your post that you were jaded BECAUSE you have been aware of it longer. It&#8217;s a weakness of text, it&#8217;s essentially transmission based, no matter how much we interact after the fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tom Hoffman		</title>
		<link>https://davecormier.com/edblog/2006/08/15/comments-notes-and-a-ah-correction/comment-page-1/#comment-3443</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Hoffman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 00:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://davecormier.com/edblog/?p=72#comment-3443</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Jeez, I never thought I&#039;d get so much heat, indirect as it may be, for pointing out that I can&#039;t really rouse myself to care about a rather obviously important issue.  I guess it depends on if being &quot;jaded&quot; is a compliment or insult.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeez, I never thought I&#8217;d get so much heat, indirect as it may be, for pointing out that I can&#8217;t really rouse myself to care about a rather obviously important issue.  I guess it depends on if being &#8220;jaded&#8221; is a compliment or insult.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Koschei		</title>
		<link>https://davecormier.com/edblog/2006/08/15/comments-notes-and-a-ah-correction/comment-page-1/#comment-3430</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Koschei]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 12:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://davecormier.com/edblog/?p=72#comment-3430</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;I&gt;A publicly traded corporation must, by its structure, take advantage of every legal opportunity. &lt;/I&gt;

As I understand it, a publicly traded corporation has a duty to maximize shareholder value. If taking advantage of an legal opportunity damages the corporation&#039;s reputation and causes it to lose business, that action could represent a management failure.

Note that (some) corporations spend lots of money on charities and environment-oriented programs that, in their face, remove money from the bottom line, but foster the image of that company as a good corporate citizen.

A good example is Apple&#039;s recent announcement of a recycling program for old computers. That&#039;s going to cost Apple lots of money in the short term, but  (Apple hopes) will increase profit in the long term by improving Apple&#039;s reputation.

Blackboard has managed to piss off a sizeable proportion of its core customers. That can&#039;t be good for business.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>A publicly traded corporation must, by its structure, take advantage of every legal opportunity. </i></p>
<p>As I understand it, a publicly traded corporation has a duty to maximize shareholder value. If taking advantage of an legal opportunity damages the corporation&#8217;s reputation and causes it to lose business, that action could represent a management failure.</p>
<p>Note that (some) corporations spend lots of money on charities and environment-oriented programs that, in their face, remove money from the bottom line, but foster the image of that company as a good corporate citizen.</p>
<p>A good example is Apple&#8217;s recent announcement of a recycling program for old computers. That&#8217;s going to cost Apple lots of money in the short term, but  (Apple hopes) will increase profit in the long term by improving Apple&#8217;s reputation.</p>
<p>Blackboard has managed to piss off a sizeable proportion of its core customers. That can&#8217;t be good for business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
