<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Rhizo14 feedback results and explanation	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://davecormier.com/edblog/2014/01/28/rhizo14-feedback-results-and-explanation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://davecormier.com/edblog/2014/01/28/rhizo14-feedback-results-and-explanation/</link>
	<description>Dave Cormier&#8217;s occasional thoughts about education and learning</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2014 23:16:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Maha		</title>
		<link>https://davecormier.com/edblog/2014/01/28/rhizo14-feedback-results-and-explanation/comment-page-1/#comment-1152804</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maha]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2014 23:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://davecormier.com/edblog/?p=984#comment-1152804</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I somehow just came across this today (i cannot imagine why i never saw it before!) but i loved reading it. In my everyday work we help faculty do surveys to get feedback on students. I now think theymight benefit from writing something like u have done to reflect on it. 
Meanwhile, i thought it was a bit funny that the whole course you are open to how participants want to take things, and in the survey, you&#039;re looking for particular answers! I am talking question  4 and remembering when u first told me about rhizo14 not necessarily reaching &quot;MOOC status&quot; which i thought referred to the numbers... How funny is it that the person who made up the term MOOC teaches sthg open and free online for the first time alone, right? But does not want to call it a MOOC. But you know i like to call it that because it brings back that connection into MOOCs again and it should be there. But am pretty sure rhizo14 was more than a cMOOC, too!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I somehow just came across this today (i cannot imagine why i never saw it before!) but i loved reading it. In my everyday work we help faculty do surveys to get feedback on students. I now think theymight benefit from writing something like u have done to reflect on it.<br />
Meanwhile, i thought it was a bit funny that the whole course you are open to how participants want to take things, and in the survey, you&#8217;re looking for particular answers! I am talking question  4 and remembering when u first told me about rhizo14 not necessarily reaching &#8220;MOOC status&#8221; which i thought referred to the numbers&#8230; How funny is it that the person who made up the term MOOC teaches sthg open and free online for the first time alone, right? But does not want to call it a MOOC. But you know i like to call it that because it brings back that connection into MOOCs again and it should be there. But am pretty sure rhizo14 was more than a cMOOC, too!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jim Stauffer		</title>
		<link>https://davecormier.com/edblog/2014/01/28/rhizo14-feedback-results-and-explanation/comment-page-1/#comment-1127038</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Stauffer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2014 03:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://davecormier.com/edblog/?p=984#comment-1127038</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Somehow I missed the call to respond to the survey.  Filled it in belatedly after reading your ruminations about the 65 who made a more timely response.  Hey, that could be called cheating  as learning - I learned that it was worth my while to take time to respond reflectively.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somehow I missed the call to respond to the survey.  Filled it in belatedly after reading your ruminations about the 65 who made a more timely response.  Hey, that could be called cheating  as learning &#8211; I learned that it was worth my while to take time to respond reflectively.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Simon		</title>
		<link>https://davecormier.com/edblog/2014/01/28/rhizo14-feedback-results-and-explanation/comment-page-1/#comment-1126601</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2014 09:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://davecormier.com/edblog/?p=984#comment-1126601</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks for real teacher geek stuff. Great classroom reading while waiting for stuff to happen. God I love downtime.
It&#039;s all g(r)eek to me.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for real teacher geek stuff. Great classroom reading while waiting for stuff to happen. God I love downtime.<br />
It&#8217;s all g(r)eek to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
