It’s my week at #change11. My topic? Rhizomatic Learning.
Rhizomatic learning is a way of thinking about learning based on ideas described by Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari in a thousand plateaus. A rhizome, sometimes called a creeping rootstalk, is a stem of a plant that sends out roots and shoots as it spreads. It is an image used by D&G to describe the way that ideas are multiple, interconnected and self-relicating. A rhizome has no beginning or end… like the learning process. I wrote my first article on the topic ‘rhizomatic education: community as curriculum’ in an article I wrote in 2008.
I’ve been talking about rhizomes and learning for about five years now. I have spent the better part of the last three months trying to collect all those thoughts together and organize them ‘properly.’ The problem with that, of course, is that the whole idea of rhizomatic learning is to acknowledge that learners come from different contexts, that they need different things, and that presuming you know what those things are is like believing in magic. It is a commitment to multiple paths. Organizing a conversation, a course, a meeting or anything else to be rhizomatic involves creating a context, maybe some boundaries, within which a conversation can grow. I’m going to try and create some context for a conversation about rhizomatic learning by offering four questions about education… and explaining how i’ve tried to answer them with this theory.
- Why do we teach?
- What does successful learning look like?
- What does a successful learner look like?
- How do we structure successful learning?
Why do we teach?
I refuse to accept that my role as a teacher is to take the knowledge in my head and put it in someone else’s. That would make for a pretty limited world 
. Why then do we teach? Are we passing on social mores? I want my students to know more than me at the end of my course. I want them to make connections i would never make. I want them to be prepared to change. I think having a set curriculum of things people are supposed to know encourages passivity. I don’t want that. We should not be preparing people for factories. I teach to try and organize people’s learning journeys… to create a context for them to learn in.
What does successful learning look like?
the rhizome pertains to a map that must be produced, constructed, a map that is always detachable, connectible, reversible, modifiable, and has multiple entryways and exits and its own lines of flight. (Deleuze and Guattari 1987, 21)
It is that map that I think successful learning looks like. Not a series of remembered ideas, reproduced for testing, and quickly forgotten. But something flexible that is already integrated with the other things a learner knows. Most things that we value ‘knowing’ are not things that are easily pointed to. Knowing is a long process of becoming (think of it in the sense of ‘becoming an expert’) where you actually change the way you perceive the world based on new understandings. You change and grow as new learning becomes part of the things you know.
Sounds a bit like networked learning…? The rhizome is, in a manner of speaking, a kind of network. It’s just a very messy, unpredictable network that isn’t bounded and grows and spreads in strange ways. As a model for knowledge, our computer idea of networks, all tidy dots connected to tidy lines, gives us a false sense of completeness.
What does a successful learner look like?
In a recent blog post i tried to offer three visions for ‘what education is for’ to help provide a departure point for discussion. Workers take accepted knowledge and store it for future reference. They accept that things are true and act accordingly. The soldier acquires more knowledge and becomes responsible for deciding what things are going to be true. The nomads make decisions for themselves. They gather what they need for their own path. I think we should be hoping for nomads.
Nomads have the ability to learn rhizomatically, to ‘self-reproduce’, to grow and change ideas as they explore new contexts. They are not looking for ‘the accepted way’, they are not looking to receive instructions, but rather to create.
How do we structure successful learning?
Establish a context
As we approach any new endeavour, we need to understand how we can speak about it. We need to learn the language, our timetables… the shortcuts that allow us to be part of a conversation. This goes into our memory. This is good. It helps us see the local context. It is not what i think of as learning… it is one of the building blocks of learning. I think of this as an open syllabus.
Community Curriculum
Gone are the days where we need to painstakingly collect information, package it up in time to send it to the printers and await the return. A curriculum for a course is something that can be created in time, while a course is happening. The syllabus becomes a garden space, a context setting within which learning can happen and the curriculum is the things that grows there. The tidiest example of this I’ve done are live slides which attempt to give room for the learners to create slides for a presentation.
Activity.
As an activity for this week I’d like you to take a piece of your own practice and think on it rhizomatically. Does it mesh with what I’ve described here? Are there goals that you want to accomplish that would not be served by a rhizomatic approach? Is there a way to change what you are doing to make it more rhizomatic? What impact would that have? Good? Bad?
I need not tell anyone that they are free to critique these ideas, they are in the open, and critique is one of the biggest reason that I post my ideas. So please, critique away.
Postscript
I am one of many who found Deleuze and Guattari’s idea of the ‘rhizome’ as a useful framework for talking about learning, education and what it is to know. Appropriately, I suppose, there is no ‘rhizomatic learning’ that you can cite and define specifically. You could take Maryanne’s view or like Glynis Cousin use it to critique the VLE or delve into this interesting series of journal articles from 2004. I should probably apologize to these scholars for not having cited their work… but, to be honest, i didn’t know about them until sometime this summer and I have been exploring the rhizome since 2005. For those of you interested in broader exploration of Deleuze in education, google is your friend. I have none of those smart people to blame for these ideas… it’s all me borrowing and twisting some of the ideas of Deleuze and Guattari, and, really, from all my network, for my own ends.
dave
I run this site... among other things.
[...] Cornier schrijft er in zijn blog al een aantal jaren over. Hij heeft er ook een beeld bij hoe onderwijs er dan [...]
[...] Rhizomatic Learning – Why we teach? Nov 05 2011 at: Dave’s Educational Blog http://davecormier.com/edblog/2011/11/05/rhizomatic-learning-why-learn/ [...]
[...] Community is the Curriculum; in his work on rhizomatic learning Dave Cormierdeveloped the great maxim that ‘the community is the curriculum’ and, in [...]
[...] it is more of a network of networks model (you kind of like the way the Internet itself works). Or rhizomes. Or pickled [...]
[...] [...]
[...] alternative pedagogical models. The first type of MOOC applies the model of Connectivism see or rhyzomic learning. These models are about student led activities where learning occurs without the [...]
[...] seeded in traditional developmental education, then where is the place for technology? What would Cormier’s rhizomatic learning (thanks OpenEd12!) look like in the context of this at-risk post-secondary model of education? [...]
what if……
a teacher is…..an individual who becomes increasingly more convinced that teaching is even more of an art and mystery and challenge than he thought
a teacher is……an individual who knows that wisdom not methodolgy is the fundamental ingredient in his success
a teacher is…..an individual who recognizes questions not answers as the dynamic of rhizomatic learning
[...] link to Dave Cormier’s post on Rhizomatic Learning in the discussion on Helen Whitehead’s Cloud. Dave Cormier will be speaking to ETMOOC on Tuesday [...]
[...] The learning I’ve done about complexity and Snowden’s framework is an example of the rhizomatic nature of learning, which was an idea I was exposed to in [...]
[...] last night’s #ETMOOC session “An Introduction to Rhizomatic Learning“, a thought by Dave Cormier rang true for me and all Responsive Classroom teachers: ‘ [...]
[...] now I listened to a talk by Dave Cormier about Rhizomatic Learning as part of participating in ETMOOC. The most important statements about what it is to me are [...]
[...] Rhizomatic Learning – Why we teach? by Dave Cormier http://davecormier.com/edblog/2011/11/05/rhizomatic-learning-why-learn/ [...]
[...] Collaborate sessions and they have been great. I really connected with this week’s topic, Rhizomatic Learning presented by Dave Cormier, for a couple of reasons. First, I love me a good metaphor (I know, [...]
[...] Collaborate sessions and they have been great. I really connected with this week’s topic, Rhizomatic Learning presented by Dave Cormier, for a couple of reasons. First, I love me a good metaphor (I know, [...]
Bravo! A wonderful website for those of us interested in moving toward an educational semiotic. The learning environment as umwelt is wonderful! Our students thrive in the rhizomatic curriculum and learner centered community that we have constructed and I appreciate this space and your words of inspiration very much!
Warmest wishes Professor Cormier….Clyde
[...] my blog posts will no doubt dig deep into my engagement and interaction with them. The concept of Rhizomatic Learning within the MOOC is something I wish to explore and this self-managed learning, wearing a nomadic [...]
[...] Cormier points out (Dave’s Educational Blog: Rhizomatic Learning – Why we teach?), “Rhizomatic Learning is a way of thinking about learning.” The rhizome is a kind of network [...]
[...] my efforts on building pedagogic practices on the foundations of connectivism, constructionism, rhizomatic learning, social constructivism, self-organised learning, reflective learning, problem-based learning, etc [...]
[...] and apply the rhizomatic learning model to our work through his 300-word introduction to the topic, a longer blog posting, a scholarly examination of the subject, and the presentation he recently facilitated as part of [...]
[...] #etmooc, I listened to Dave Cormier‘s presentation and later listend to his EdTechTalk and read resources by Christina [...]
[...] on my collaborative and participatory experiences has been learning, from Dave Cormier, about Rhizomatic learning. I find this concept truly fascinating and will likely apply it to the work I am doing at eHealth. [...]
[...] thereby a lively yet contolled classroom, not a silent classroom (as Dave Cormier points out, Rhizomatic Learning can get ‘messy’). As observed in Build a School in The Cloud, discussion and collaboration, and indeed a little [...]
[...] Wiley’s 4Rs of OERconcept, and Dave Cormier’s vision of rhizomatic learning, Open Learning In Action advocates and shares how openness in education promotes active [...]
[...] with Dave Cormier here.) I googled ‘Rhizomatic learning’ and found Dave Cormier’s blog “Dave’s Educational Blog” and did some reading. The idea of rhizomatic learning was making my brain hurt. (The last time [...]
[...] then form the basis of fractals, where such interactions repeat in various forms, as in the case of rhizomatic learning, or in connectivist learning all based on interaction and [...]
[...] David: http://davecormier.com/edblog/2011/11/05/rhizomatic-learning-why-learn/ Aprendizaje [...]
[...] Dave Cormier’s excellent blog posting on the subject he offers the following quote from Deleuze and [...]
[...] Sbert Balaguer: Aplicacions Miscellaneous 4SIB Aprendizaje 1 Sort Share davecormier.com 0 minutes [...]